Led Zeppelin II 1969

Reviews

No reviews yet.

• The Austin Chronicle3/5 ★
• Consequence of SoundA−
• Pitchfork10/10
• Q5/5 ★
• Rolling Stone4.5/5 ★

As listed in the ratings box of Wikipedia’s article (CC BY-SA). Not part of Tastebuds's numbers.

Where to listen

Each opens a search for this album on that service.

Similar in taste

Closest on the same fourteen dimensions, from everything scored on Tastebuds Other media included when they land close.

• 
  [Led Zeppelin IV] 197182% alike

  Both grave, earnest, spare.
• 
  Appetite for Destruction 198769% alike

  Both classical in form, spare, grave.
• 
  Paranoid 197069% alike

  Both grave, earnest, spare.
• 
  The Colour and the Shape 199769% alike

  Both spare, grave, earnest.
• 
  (What’s the Story) Morning Glory? 199569% alike

  Both classical in form, spare, grave.
• 
  Songs for the Deaf 200267% alike

  Both spare, grave, classical in form.
• 
  Thriller 198267% alike

  Both spare, classical in form, grave.
• 
  Nevermind 199165% alike

  Both spare, grave, classical in form.
• 
  The Defiant Ones 201768% alike

  Television · Both grave, earnest, classical in form.
• 
  The Bridges at Toko-Ri 195466% alike

  Film · Both earnest, classical in form, grave.

• “Is this Led Zeppelin's best work?”

  Sign in to answer.

  Be the first to answer.

• “Is the best-known track the weakest one?”

  Sign in to answer.

  Be the first to answer.

• “Would Led Zeppelin II hit harder if it came out today rather than in 1969?”

  Sign in to answer.

  Be the first to answer.