

Some things you can't unsee.
A young mother and her twin sons move into a rural house that's marked for death.
- Harm to children
Log it
Sign in to log this.
Character
Unpretentious, grave, contemporary and bleak.
- unpretentiousprestige
- gravecomic
- contemporarynostalgic
- warmbleak
- earnestironic
Who loves it, who doesn't
No profiled raters yet.
Where do you stand?
Answer first; then see how everyone, and your circle, split.
“Is it actually scary?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
“Is James Ransone the best thing in Sinister 2?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
“Would a little humor have helped?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
Ask the title
A yes-or-no question, answered from what people wrote here, on TMDB and on Wikipedia. Never made up.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
Reviews on TMDB
Written by TMDB members; each links to the original. Not part of Tastebuds's numbers.
- mattwilde123on TMDB · Mar 20173/10
Modern horror sequels are often failures. I thought that as the first film wasn't great that I wouldn't be as disappointed if this film turned out to be bad. I was wrong, Compared to this, the first instalment was a masterpiece and this made me realise how it was successful at achieving its goals sometimes. 'Sinister 2' was quite scary in places. No doubt, the cinema playing the film super loud helped elevate the jump scares though. The creepy depictions of murder in the first film were crazily overdone in this. The screenplay was terrible. The main story was stale and predictable and the characters were unsympathetic and cold. The performances were poor all over this film in particularly the ghost children seemed like they were performing a rubbish school pantomime. Overall, I can't be too surprised with what I thought of this film but, sadly, I can see sequels for this being churned out more and more in the future. ★½
Read the whole review on TMDB - Renoon TMDB · Jul 20164/10
> What's the most dangerous? The dark force or the evil father. The first film was good, I enjoyed it, but not scary. So a sequel was expected and it failed to live up to the standards of the original. I would say, it was a decent horror film, with more story and drama than the creepy atmosphere. One character retained from the previous and the core theme remained, but tried a different method of narration. Something like 'Goodnight Mommy' with two brothers and mystery events surrounding them. It definitely lacks what a horror film required the most, and predictable too. But the story wise, it was decent, because the actors did a good job. So it is an average film. I expected a better ending and it did not conclude at its best leaving me disappointing. The way it ended might have been the suitable for the story, but I wasn't impressed. Again, another sequel is most certain, so I think this tale is not over yet and chances are very high that the story would follow with the same cast. It was not a bad flick, but not a follow-up you would have wanted. If you're looking for a genuine horror film, then you should skip it. There's nothing brilliance to appreciate at any level. Overall, I
Read the whole review on TMDB - Frank Ochiengon TMDB · Oct 2015
In filmmaker Scott Derrickson’s original ‘Sinister’, this writer’s critical impressions toward the sub-par psychological yarn was rather blunt if not consistent with the steady diet of formulaic fightfests. The following passage pretty much sums up the cinematic sentiments from the movie’s critique: 'At best Sinister is a lukewarm twitchy tale that routinely teases the audience with the obligatory guessing game of whether or not the conjured up evil-minded spookiness is imagined…cheapened scare tactics, an ambiguous monstrous myth, transparent characterizations and a mixed bag of a supernatural storyline barely put any Sinister thoughts in our heads worth contemplating.‘ Well, say what you will about the first ‘Sinister’ outing but it at least had some slight star power in lead Ethan Hawke whose presence was one of the minor pluses in Derrickson’s shoddy shocker. In director Ciaran Foy’s (‘The Citadel’) tingling yet generic ‘Sinister II’, we hardly experience the essence of top-notch horror-induced hedonism. Feverishly flat, the creepily clichéd ‘Sinister II’ continues the tedious tradition of assembling sure-fire goose bump moments yet never really fortifying these mentioned momen
Read the whole review on TMDB
Cast
- James RansoneEx-Deputy So & So
- Shannyn SossamonCourtney Collins
- Robert Daniel SloanDylan Collins
- Dartanian SloanZach Collins
- Tate EllingtonDr. Stomberg
- Lea CocoClint Collins
- John BeasleyFather Rodriguez
- Lucas Jade ZumannMilo
- Jaden KleinTed
- Laila HaleyEmma
Crew
- Ciarán FoyDirector
- C. Robert CargillWriter
- Scott DerricksonWriter
- Amy VincentDirector of Photography
- Andy MilburnOriginal Music Composer
- Tom HajduOriginal Music Composer
- tomandandyOriginal Music Composer
- Michael TrentEditor
- Timothy AlversonEditor
- Ken BlackwellEditor
Where to watch
Checking availability…
Similar in taste
Closest on the same fourteen dimensions, from everything scored on Tastebuds Other media included when they land close.
Saint Catherine 202489% alikeBoth grave, unpretentious, contemporary.
Mercy Black 201986% alikeBoth unpretentious, grave, classical in form.
Don't Look at the Demon 202285% alikeBoth grave, unpretentious, contemporary.
A Savannah Haunting 202283% alikeBoth grave, unpretentious, contemporary.
Extinction 201583% alikeBoth contemporary, grave, unpretentious.
Anything for Jackson 202083% alikeBoth unpretentious, grave, contemporary.
Hunter Hunter 202082% alikeBoth grave, unpretentious, classical in form.
Bagman 202482% alikeBoth grave, unpretentious, earnest.
Devil in Ohio 202279% alikeTelevision · Both grave, contemporary, earnest.
Game · Both grave, unpretentious, contemporary.
Often watched with
Recommendations from TMDB. Opening one adds it to Tastebuds










