

The whole world knows the Holocaust happened. Now she needs to prove it.
Acclaimed writer and historian Deborah E. Lipstadt must battle for historical truth to prove the Holocaust actually occurred when David Irving, a renowned denier, sues her for libel.
Log it
Sign in to log this.
Character
Earnest, classical in form, grave and resolved.
- earnestironic
- classical in formformally daring
- gravecomic
- resolvedopen-ended
- contemporarynostalgic
Who loves it, who doesn't
No profiled raters yet.
Where do you stand?
Answer first; then see how everyone, and your circle, split.
“Is Rachel Weisz the best thing in Denial?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
“Does it take too many liberties with the true story?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
“Would a little humor have helped?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
Ask the title
A yes-or-no question, answered from what people wrote here, on TMDB and on Wikipedia. Never made up.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
Reviews on TMDB
Written by TMDB members; each links to the original. Not part of Tastebuds's numbers.
- Renoon TMDB · Feb 20177/10
**A courtroom drama about who's right and who's wrong!** There are many factors to consider, especially for a film like this. Yep, the film was based on the real courtroom event. The film is about two people to prove they're right on their book about the war crimes whether that took place or not. So all the episodes take place in a British high court with mention of Auschwitz concentration camp, particularly about its ruins than the events that happened in there. That means it's a great drama to learn about how these two fought in a lawsuit face-off, but there's nothing about the real event just like the film 'The Eichmann Show'. If you are not a Jew or a neo nazi or not even a European and North American, then this is an okayish film from the entertainment aspect, other than learning truth and history. I really expected some real events, but we have already seen in many films about Auschwitz camp. So they kept this film as a modern day court trial than mixing up with those old crime. Great acting by all. Timothy Spall nailed it in his negative role. He was just a fine supporting actor, till I started to recognise him since his genius display in a biopic, 'Mr. Turner'. This is his
Read the whole review on TMDB
Cast
- Rachel WeiszDeborah Lipstadt
- Tom WilkinsonRichard Rampton
- Timothy SpallDavid Irving
- Andrew ScottAnthony Julius
- Jack LowdenJames Libson
- Caren PistoriusLaura Tyler
- Alex JenningsSir Charles Gray
- Harriet WalterVera Reich
- Mark GatissProfessor Robert Jan van Pelt
- John SessionsProf. Richard Evans
Crew
- Mick JacksonDirector
- David HareScreenplay
- Haris ZambarloukosDirector of Photography
- Howard ShoreOriginal Music Composer
- Justine WrightEditor
- Gary FosterProducer
- Russ KrasnoffProducer
- Marta HabiorProducer
Where to watch
Checking availability…
Pairings
Companions we picked from the closest works, and how to take them.
Similar in taste
Closest on the same fourteen dimensions, from everything scored on Tastebuds Other media included when they land close.
Shattered Glass 200375% alikeBoth classical in form, earnest, grave.
Marshall 201773% alikeBoth classical in form, earnest, grave.
The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind 201972% alikeBoth earnest, classical in form, grave.
Breach 200772% alikeBoth classical in form, earnest, grave.
Official Secrets 201972% alikeBoth earnest, classical in form, grave.
Norma Rae 197972% alikeBoth earnest, classical in form, grave.
Both classical in form, grave, earnest.
The Verdict 198271% alikeBoth classical in form, earnest, grave.
Inspector Morse 198772% alikeTelevision · Both classical in form, earnest, grave.
Akane-banashi 202669% alikeTelevision · Both earnest, classical in form, grave.
Often watched with
Recommendations from TMDB. Opening one adds it to Tastebuds













