All hail.
England, 15th century. Hal, a capricious prince who lives among the populace far from court, is forced by circumstances to reluctantly accept the throne and become Henry V.
Log it
Sign in to log this.
Character
Grave, epic, classical in form and earnest.
- gravecomic
- intimateepic
- classical in formformally daring
- earnestironic
- rawmeticulous
Who loves it, who doesn't
No profiled raters yet.
Where do you stand?
Answer first; then see how everyone, and your circle, split.
“Is Timothée Chalamet the best thing in The King?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
“Is it too big for its own story?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
“Does it take too many liberties with the true story?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
Ask the title
A yes-or-no question, answered from what people wrote here, on TMDB and on Wikipedia. Never made up.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
Reviews on TMDB
Written by TMDB members; each links to the original. Not part of Tastebuds's numbers.
- CinemaSerfon TMDB · May 20246/10
At last an opportunity to see Timothée Chalamet doing something a little grittier. Sadly, t'was not to be. His portrayal of this great character from early 15th Century British history left me cold. He looked like a good meal would have killed him, never mind a bloodthirsty foe clad in iron armed with an axe. The accent held up reasonably well, but he still struggles to shake off the winsome, "butter wouldn't melt" image and as he has to pretty much carry this film en seul, it just doesn't really work. The rare appearances by Robert Pattinson border on the hammy; with his final appearance reminding me of the first few steps taken by "Bambi" back in 1942. It is great that Netflix are prepared to fund projects like this, but the plain truth is that no amount of money can compensate for a poor screenplay - think Shakespeare "light" - supplemented with a few high-profile cameo contributions and some, admittedly, fantastic battle scenarios.
Read the whole review on TMDB - Roryyeungon TMDB · Oct 20227/10
It’s a fine half-adaptation, but suffers from the compromise it makes. On the one hand, it is not simply another adaptation of Shakespeare - it has the advantages of taking a fresh look at the material, but for whatever reason still somehow carried across much of the fictional elements of Shakespeare’s plays. At the same time, whilst the writing is good, it lacks the poetry of a more straight adaptation (e.g. the Hollow Crown). I do find the performances to be compelling, and in particular, find it interesting to see Henry V as a contemplative humanist rather than a victorious warlord. It’s an interesting idea (if perhaps ahistoric) and does perhaps act as a medication on more modern conflicts. In particular, the film diverges significantly from Shakespeare’s plot significantly towards the end. It seems to try to this to change to modify the original 16th century propaganda of the play to a discussion of Realpolitik. This is a good idea in principle, but is somewhat undercut from having just watched an hour glorifying Henry. It is also technically impressive - both the art and cinematography departments have outdone themselves - standards we have perhaps come to expect from Netflix
Read the whole review on TMDB - Splinteron TMDB · Nov 2019
Just finished The King, a modern interpretation of parts of Shakespeare's Henry IV and Henry V, seemingly targeted at millennials. It's common knowledge that much of Shakespeare's Henry V is based on hearsay, yet his pre-battle speeches at Barfleur ('Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more.') and Agincourt ('We band of brothers') have become the stuff of legend and remain the most stirring battle speeches of our time. In The King, Henry's pre-battle speech at Agincourt is neither stirring or inspirational due to being a watered-down, 21st-century, politically correct rendition, which I found hard to stomach. The King portrays Henry (Hal) as a pacifist and reluctant leader, a fop to Catherine of Valois and I found Timothee Chalomet's (an American) performance as Hal to be too 21st century and not in the slightest bit convincing. In fact, he seemed reluctant to carry out any of the deeds that the real Henry V actually carried out. The battle scenes were very realistic and the cinematography was superb, but... This is yet another nod to the PC millennials, diluting and revising both Shakespeare and history into easily digestible snack bites for the sensitive of our era.
Read the whole review on TMDB
Cast
- Timothée ChalametHal
- Joel EdgertonFalstaff
- Sean HarrisWilliam
- Tom Glynn-CarneyHotspur
- Lily-Rose DeppCatherine
- Thomasin McKenziePhilippa, Queen of Denmark
- Robert PattinsonThe Dauphin
- Ben MendelsohnKing Henry IV
- Andrew HavillArchbishop of Canterbury
- Dean-Charles ChapmanThomas
Crew
- David MichôdDirector
- David MichôdScreenplay
- Joel EdgertonScreenplay
- Adam ArkapawDirector of Photography
- Nicholas BritellOriginal Music Composer
- Peter SciberrasEditor
- Brad PittProducer
- Jeremy KleinerProducer
- David MichôdProducer
Where to watch
Checking availability…
Pairings
Companions we picked from the closest works, and how to take them.
Similar in taste
Closest on the same fourteen dimensions, from everything scored on Tastebuds Other media included when they land close.
Patton 197086% alikeBoth grave, epic, classical in form.
W. 200880% alikeBoth classical in form, grave, epic.
Darkest Hour 201780% alikeBoth grave, earnest, classical in form.
Both grave, classical in form, earnest.
The Searchers 195679% alikeBoth grave, classical in form, earnest.
Bugsy 199179% alikeBoth grave, classical in form, earnest.
The Butler 201379% alikeBoth grave, earnest, classical in form.
The Bridge on the River Kwai 195778% alikeBoth classical in form, grave, earnest.
The Crown 201681% alikeTelevision · Both grave, classical in form, epic.
Mrs. America 202080% alikeTelevision · Both classical in form, grave, earnest.
Often watched with
Recommendations from TMDB. Opening one adds it to Tastebuds
