

The man who made 007 a household number.
Diamonds are stolen only to be sold again in the international market. James Bond infiltrates a smuggling mission to find out who's guilty. The mission takes him to Las Vegas where Bond meets his archenemy Blofeld.
Log it
Sign in to log this.
Character
Unpretentious, resolved, classical in form and cool.
- unpretentiousprestige
- resolvedopen-ended
- classical in formformally daring
- cooloverwhelming
- intimateepic
Who loves it, who doesn't
21 profiled raters. Loved most by The Genre Devotees; disliked most by The Formalists.
Where do you stand?
Answer first; then see how everyone, and your circle, split.
“Is it too cool to love?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
“Does the pace leave no room to feel anything?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
“Is it too big for its own story?”
Sign in to answer.
Be the first to answer.
Ask the title
A yes-or-no question, answered from what people wrote here, on TMDB and on Wikipedia. Never made up.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
Reviews on TMDB
Written by TMDB members; each links to the original. Not part of Tastebuds's numbers.
- drystyxon TMDB · Apr 20236/10
007 follows a blood trail of diamond smuggling. Of course it leads to a dastardly villain. This one has a lot of the Bond elements. There is a lot of action, almost non stop, a lot of nice scenery, though not as great as the great Bond films. And there is wit. Also lacking, due to the women's lib era being at its height, is the beautiful women. There is one super hot babe who quickly drowns to appease the women's lib. The director seemed to want to make the point he was appeasing women's lib by presenting Jill St John (who isn't as homely as she appears in this movie) in a woman's lib fashion. A young boy even asks a mature man if Tiffany Case (Jill St. John) is his mother. Oops. There is also a major problem with the "non pro" character who is supposed to be likable. The tycoon who is kidnapped is not likable at all, and that's a major weakness. The saving grace is a very humorous (dark humor) pair of gay assassins. Their goofy quips are meant to be "groaners". They raise this a notch or two from me. Not the best Bond, but far from the worst, because later in the series, we really saw the hate pouring out from Hollywood.
Read the whole review on TMDB - Wuchakon TMDB · May 20216/10
_**The series gets silly as James Bond goes to Las Vegas**_ Agent 007 (Sean Connery) is sent to Las Vegas to uncover a smuggling ring and suspects Blofeld (Charles Gray) is masterminding the nefarious operation; meanwhile a gay duo of assassins threatens the investigation. Jill St. John plays a smuggling contact while Lana Wood is on hand as a casino opportunist. "Diamonds are Forever" (1971) marks Connery’s return to the series after four years absence and missing out on the previous movie featuring George Lazenby. This one’s entertaining throughout, but it introduced a silly, cartoonish element more glaring than anything up to this point. Then there’s the fact that the storyline is almost impossible to follow unlike the previous installments which were easy to grasp, like “Dr. No,” “Goldfinger,” “Thunderball” and “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.” You just have to kick back and enjoy the madness of it all. Beautiful Lana Wood stands out on the female front, but her role is too brief (her apparel too, lol). Meanwhile Jill St. John is lots of fun, not to mention alluring. Needless to say, Vegas makes for a great setting for a James Bond flick. There are neon lights, highrise hotels
Read the whole review on TMDB - GenerationofSwineon TMDB · Jan 20232/10
MOST of the bad reviews on a lot of the Connery era 007 movies are... political. They don't like classic 60s 007 because of contemporary Woke six decades later politics. But.... this one just sucks. And, keep in mind, I say this with Connery being my favorite 007 and 4 out of his 5 (6 should NOT be counted) outings are my favorite 007 films. However, this is Connery playing a goofy Roger Moore era 007 and that doesn't work. This is Connery in a film that had all the coming Moore tropes. And that doesn't work. Had Diamonds are Forever been a Roger Moore 007, it wouldn't have been that bad. This was Moore's Bond film... only it had Connery in it, so it just didn't work.
Read the whole review on TMDB
Cast
- Sean ConneryJames Bond
- Jill St. JohnTiffany Case
- Charles GrayErnst Stavro Blofeld
- Lana WoodPlenty O'Toole
- Jimmy DeanWillard Whyte
- Bruce CabotAlbert R. Saxby
- Putter SmithM. Kidd
- Bruce GloverM. Wint
- Norman BurtonFelix Leiter
- Joseph FürstProfesseur Docteur Metz
Crew
- Guy HamiltonDirector
- Richard MaibaumScreenplay
- Tom MankiewiczScreenplay
- Ian FlemingNovel
- Ted MooreDirector of Photography
- John BarryOriginal Music Composer
- Bert BatesEditor
- John W. HolmesEditor
- Albert R. BroccoliProducer
- Harry SaltzmanProducer
Where to watch
Checking availability…
Pairings
Companions we picked from the closest works, and how to take them.
Similar in taste
Closest on the same fourteen dimensions, from everything scored on Tastebuds Other media included when they land close.
The Man with the Golden Gun 197485% alikeBoth unpretentious, resolved, classical in form.
Live and Let Die 197383% alikeBoth unpretentious, resolved, classical in form.
Moonraker 197981% alikeBoth unpretentious, resolved, epic.
Octopussy 198380% alikeBoth unpretentious, resolved, classical in form.
Both unpretentious, resolved, cool.
Heroic Trio 2: Executioners 199378% alikeBoth unpretentious, resolved, classical in form.
Both unpretentious, epic, classical in form.
Both unpretentious, classical in form, resolved.
The Avengers 196184% alikeTelevision · Both resolved, unpretentious, cool.
The Man from U.N.C.L.E. 196478% alikeTelevision · Both unpretentious, resolved, classical in form.
Often watched with
Recommendations from TMDB. Opening one adds it to Tastebuds













