

- War, Action, Drama
- 107 min
- PG-13
Rotten Tomatoes92%Metacritic94IMDb7.8
When 400,000 men couldn't get home, home came for them.
The story of the miraculous evacuation of Allied soldiers from Belgium, Britain, Canada and France, who were cut off and surrounded by the German army from the beaches and harbour of Dunkirk between May 26th and June 4th 1940 during World War II.
Log it
Sign in to log this.
Character
Grave, earnest, plot-driven and epic.
- gravecomic
- earnestironic
- character-ledplot-driven
- intimateepic
- contemplativerelentless
Who loves it, who doesn't
No profiled raters yet.
Ask the title
A yes-or-no question, answered from what people wrote here, on TMDB and on Wikipedia. Never made up.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
Reviews on TMDB
Written by TMDB members; each links to the original. Not part of Tastebuds's numbers.
- Dark Jedion TMDB · Jan 20194/10
I have put off viewing this film for quite a while. The main reason for this is that I am somewhat reluctant watching a movie where the story is pretty well known before you sit down to watch it. However a few days ago I finally did and, given all the hype, I have to say that I expected more, a lot more. Sure the movie is a cinematically very well down movie. Acting, camera and all that is excellent. Unfortunately that is all there is. First of all, where the hell did the over-inflated budget go? Dunkirk was a major undertaking with almost 400 000 soldiers involved and hundreds and hundreds of boats. We get to see what? A few columns of soldiers, a handful of boats and three pitiful spitfires against a bomber and two Fock Wulfes. To add to this insult we pretty much get to see the same bloody event over and over from different angles. This is an insult to all the brave men that made this rescue possible. There are a few likable people in the movie. Like the Navy commander and the elderly guy on the pleasure boat steaming to rescue. The rest are either psychotic or morons. Realism? Not so much. Like the scene where a bunch of soldiers are trapped in a boat being shot to pieces. Woul
Read the whole review on TMDB - dezmozegreatoon TMDB · Jan 20189/10
I want to start by saying I’m tired of seeing the big names in every movie I see, I think at times big name actors can take away from a movie more than benefit. Dunkirk did a great job of allowing us to focus less on the actors and more on the story. I feel this movie put me in the story and allowed to experience first hand some of the lives that were impacted. There wasn’t a lot of character building in this movie, but that’s what I loved, I feel like I was allowed to more so build on the experience over one person’s story. Since we’re not typically used to a movie being experience based over character based, I think some may find this as a flaw. I did not. There were multiple stories and perspectives, all which immerse you into the current situation. Christopher Nolan did a great job of creating an overwhelming feeling of hopelessness throughout the movie, I felt like I could never feel safe and constantly looked for a way out. I was on the edge of my seat for the majority of the movie. **Dunkirk was a great roller coaster ride that allowed a view one may otherwise never experience.**
Read the whole review on TMDB - defjeffon TMDB · Sep 20177/10
Dunkirk is a beautiful and unconventional World War 2 epic that is undoubtedly captivating, but it takes risks that may alienate some viewers. When people talk about a film they think it's about the setting, but it's actually about the characters. Saving Private Ryan isn't about World War 2. It tells a story about a squad of soldiers tasked with finding a young Private Ryan and getting him back safely to his family. Saying Dunkirk is a film about the Battle of Dunkirk however, is not inaccurate. The setting and characters are one. The choppy waters of the English Channel are equally as important, if not more so than the people who fought and died in them. As much as this makes for an interesting way to make a mainstream war film, it's also the reason why I wouldn't care to sit through it again. In some ways, it feels like watching a documentary with the narration turned off. I walked away impressed, and at the same time emotionally and intellectually unfulfilled.
Read the whole review on TMDB
Cast
- Fionn WhiteheadTommy
- Tom HardyFarrier
- Mark RylanceMr. Dawson
- Kenneth BranaghCommander Bolton
- Cillian MurphyShivering Soldier
- Barry KeoghanGeorge
- Harry StylesAlex
- Aneurin BarnardGibson
- Damien BonnardFrench Soldier
- Lee ArmstrongGrenadier
Crew
- Christopher NolanDirector
- Christopher NolanWriter
- Hoyte van HoytemaDirector of Photography
- Hans ZimmerOriginal Music Composer
- Lee SmithEditor
- Christopher NolanProducer
- Emma ThomasProducer
Cameos
- Michael CaineVoice on Radio
Where to watch
Checking availability…
Similar in taste
Closest on the same fourteen dimensions, from everything scored on Tastebuds Other media included when they land close.
1917 201978% alikeBoth grave, earnest, plot-driven.
Beowulf 200768% alikeBoth grave, epic.
City of God 200266% alikeBoth grave, relentless, overwhelming.
The Big Red One 198065% alikeBoth grave, earnest, epic.
Both grave, earnest, plot-driven.
Kiss Me Deadly 195563% alikeBoth grave, earnest, relentless.
The Manchurian Candidate 196263% alikeBoth grave, earnest, meticulous; this one is more classical in form.
The Northman 202263% alikeBoth grave, earnest, plot-driven.- Tommy 196974% alikeMusic · Both grave, earnest, epic.
Battlefield 1 201674% alikeGame · Both grave, earnest, epic.
Often watched with
Recommendations from TMDB. Opening one adds it to Tastebuds








